public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
@ 2005-07-03 11:34 jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:37 ` [Bug c++/22284] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 more replies)
0 siblings, 19 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-03 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Many C++ testsuite execution tests started failing on mainline between 20050627
and 20050630, on platforms including hppa2.0w-hpux, hppa64-hpux and ia64-hpux.
gcc-testresults shows failures also on other platforms such as ia64-linux.
Binary searching for "g++.dg/eh/cond1.C execution test" as a test failing on all
the above platforms shows that on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.23 it started failing
between 2005-06-27 07:39 UTC and 2005-06-27 07:42 UTC, i.e. this is caused by
the stack protection patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-06/msg00980.html
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00116.html> might be relevant
except that the problem includes targets not using sjlj exceptions.
--
Summary: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,jakub at gcc dot gnu dot
org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-03 11:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-03 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |EH, sjlj-eh, wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:37 ` [Bug c++/22284] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-03 11:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 12:09 ` jakub at redhat dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-03 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|sjlj-eh |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:37 ` [Bug c++/22284] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-03 12:09 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2005-07-03 12:17 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at redhat dot com @ 2005-07-03 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-07-03 12:08 -------
Strange, I have certainly bootstrapped/regtested the initial -fstack-protector
patch on ia64-linux and there were no regressions, neither on HEAD
(20050625 tree + those patches) nor in the 4.0.1 backport.
g++.dg/eh/cond1.C compiles/runs just fine for me.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-03 12:09 ` jakub at redhat dot com
@ 2005-07-03 12:17 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2005-07-03 13:40 ` jakub at redhat dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-07-03 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-03 12:17 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, jakub at redhat dot com wrote:
> Strange, I have certainly bootstrapped/regtested the initial -fstack-protector
> patch on ia64-linux and there were no regressions, neither on HEAD
> (20050625 tree + those patches) nor in the 4.0.1 backport.
> g++.dg/eh/cond1.C compiles/runs just fine for me.
Example ia64-linux results showing the failure are at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00117.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg01730.html
I don't have access to ia64-linux to run a regression search there, but I
can run one on ia64-hpux if necessary to see if it is the same patch
causing the failures there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-03 12:17 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-07-03 13:40 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2005-07-03 13:54 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at redhat dot com @ 2005-07-03 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-07-03 13:40 -------
Ok, I can now reproduce the g++.dg/eh/cond1.C failure with trunk GCC.
It works well when run against 4.0 libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one
(but in that case built with the -fstack-protector patch in).
Now, g++ 4.0 compiled/linked g++.dg/eh/cond1 also works when run against 4.0
libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one, but segfaults when using 20050703 HEAD
libstdc++.so (FYI, libgcc_s exact version doesn't matter).
cond1.s compiled by 20050703 HEAD and 4.0 is in fact identical except
.ident and COMDAT section names.
I have also built 20050703 HEAD libstdc++.so with g++ 4.0 (had to add
#include <ia64intrin.h> into ia64/atomicity.h), and cond1 also segfaults
against such built libstdc++.so. That g++ 4.0 was without -fstack-protector
patches FYI.
So I'm pretty positive this is caused by some libstdc++ EH change,
with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-06/msg01019.html being the suspected
one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-03 13:40 ` jakub at redhat dot com
@ 2005-07-03 13:54 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2005-07-03 18:24 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-07-03 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-03 13:54 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, jakub at redhat dot com wrote:
> Ok, I can now reproduce the g++.dg/eh/cond1.C failure with trunk GCC.
> It works well when run against 4.0 libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one
> (but in that case built with the -fstack-protector patch in).
> Now, g++ 4.0 compiled/linked g++.dg/eh/cond1 also works when run against 4.0
> libstdc++.so, or 20050625 HEAD one, but segfaults when using 20050703 HEAD
> libstdc++.so (FYI, libgcc_s exact version doesn't matter).
> cond1.s compiled by 20050703 HEAD and 4.0 is in fact identical except
> .ident and COMDAT section names.
> I have also built 20050703 HEAD libstdc++.so with g++ 4.0 (had to add
> #include <ia64intrin.h> into ia64/atomicity.h), and cond1 also segfaults
> against such built libstdc++.so. That g++ 4.0 was without -fstack-protector
> patches FYI.
> So I'm pretty positive this is caused by some libstdc++ EH change,
> with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-06/msg01019.html being the suspected
> one.
I'm now running binary searches on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 and
hppa64-hp-hpux11.23 to confirm the responsible patches on those platforms.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-03 13:54 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-07-03 18:24 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-04 10:47 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-03 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-03 18:24 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-04 10:47 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-06 21:29 ` [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] sjlj exception handling broken rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-04 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-04 10:47 -------
On hppa64-hp-hpux11.23, appeared between 2005-06-27 07:39 UTC and 2005-06-27
07:42 UTC, so stack protection patch is responsible.
On ia64-hp-hpux11.23, appeared between 2005-06-28 19:33 UTC and 2005-06-28 20:08
UTC, so the mentioned series of exception handling patches is likely responsible.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] sjlj exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-04 10:47 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-06 21:29 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-06 21:39 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-06 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-06 21:29:02
date| |
Summary|[4.1 Regression] Many C++ |[4.1 Regression] sjlj
|testsuite failures |exception handling broken
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] sjlj exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-06 21:29 ` [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] sjlj exception handling broken rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-06 21:39 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-07 22:49 ` [Bug middle-end/22284] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-06 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06 21:39 -------
Also fails on arm-elf and arm-netbsdelf. Reverting the call of
sjlj_emit_function_exit_after (function.c revision 1.628) to its previous
location fixes the failures on arm-elf.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] sjlj exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-06 21:39 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-07 22:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-16 21:31 ` [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-07 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 22:48 -------
sjlj problems seem mostly fixed as of 20050707 mainline compilers, but IA64
failures remain.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-07 22:49 ` [Bug middle-end/22284] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-16 21:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 5:46 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-16 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16 21:15 -------
Only IA64 exception handling is broken. IA64 exceptions almost always uses libunwind, right (even if
GCC creates the libunwind)?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1 Regression] sjlj |[4.1 Regression] ia64
|exception handling broken |exception handling broken
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-16 21:31 ` [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-22 5:46 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2005-07-22 6:25 ` hjl at lucon dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2005-07-22 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 05:45 -------
I have identified that
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01149.html
is the cause.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-22 5:46 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2005-07-22 6:25 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2005-07-22 17:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/22284] " hjl at lucon dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2005-07-22 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1448 bytes --]
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 05:51 -------
It looks like the unwind info in libstdc++.so is bad.
(gdb) r
Starting program:
/export/build/gnu/gcc-next/build-ia64-linux/gcc/testsuite/cond1.exe
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x20000000001b9b90 in read_encoded_value_with_base (encoding=180 '´', base=0,
p=0x40000000000021b0 "\002", val=0x60000fffffffa5d0) at unwind-pe.h:267
267 result = *(_Unwind_Internal_Ptr *) result;
Current language: auto; currently c++
(gdb) p result
$1 = 232
(gdb) bt
#0 0x20000000001b9b90 in read_encoded_value_with_base (encoding=180 '´',
base=0, p=0x40000000000021b0 "\002", val=0x60000fffffffa5d0)
at unwind-pe.h:267
#1 0x20000000001ba2e0 in get_ttype_entry (info=0x60000fffffffa608, i=Variable
"i" is not available.
)
at
/net/gnu-3/export/gnu/src/gcc-next/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_personality.cc:209
#2 0x20000000001babb0 in __gxx_personality_v0 (version=Variable "version" is
not available.
)
at
/net/gnu-3/export/gnu/src/gcc-next/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_personality.cc:550
#3 0x20000000002ec590 in _Unwind_RaiseException () from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
#4 0x20000000001bb420 in __cxa_throw (obj=Variable "obj" is not available.
)
at /net/gnu-3/export/gnu/src/gcc-next/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_throw.cc:72
#5 0x4000000000000d00 in main ()
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-22 6:25 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2005-07-22 17:26 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2005-07-22 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2005-07-22 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 17:24 -------
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01510.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
Component|middle-end |libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-22 17:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/22284] " hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2005-07-22 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 15:14 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-22 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 17:53 -------
*** Bug 22614 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-22 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-25 15:14 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2005-07-29 13:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-29 13:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2005-07-25 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-07-25 15:04 -------
I tested the proposed patch on IA64 HP-UX and Linux and it did fix the EH
problems I saw without the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-25 15:14 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
@ 2005-07-29 13:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-29 13:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-29 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:36 -------
Subject: Bug 22284
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: hjl@gcc.gnu.org 2005-07-29 13:35:59
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/libsupc++: eh_personality.cc
Log message:
2005-07-29 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR libstdc++/22284
* libsupc++/eh_personality.cc (PERSONALITY_FUNCTION): Revert
the change to info.ttype_base.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3066&r2=1.3067
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_personality.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-29 13:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-29 13:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-29 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:50 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-29 13:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-03 11:34 [Bug c++/22284] New: [4.1 Regression] Many C++ testsuite failures jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:37 ` [Bug c++/22284] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 11:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-03 12:09 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2005-07-03 12:17 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2005-07-03 13:40 ` jakub at redhat dot com
2005-07-03 13:54 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2005-07-03 18:24 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-04 10:47 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-06 21:29 ` [Bug c++/22284] [4.1 Regression] sjlj exception handling broken rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-06 21:39 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-07 22:49 ` [Bug middle-end/22284] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-16 21:31 ` [Bug middle-end/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-22 5:46 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2005-07-22 6:25 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2005-07-22 17:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/22284] " hjl at lucon dot org
2005-07-22 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-25 15:14 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
2005-07-29 13:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-29 13:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).