public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
@ 2005-08-01 10:53 reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-01 11:48 ` [Bug c++/23171] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-01 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The following code snippet causes an ICE on mainline when compiled
with "g++ -O" (the C frontend is not affected):

=============================
int *p = (int*)(int[1]){0};
=============================

bug.cc:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'expression', have
'exceptional' (constructor) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]

-- 
           Summary: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-01 11:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-01 11:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-01 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-01 11:48 ` [Bug c++/23171] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-01 11:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-22  5:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-01 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-01 11:58 -------
This is the same problem as PR 22533 really.

So it is not only the Ada front-end that produces &CONSTRUCTOR.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |22533
              nThis|                            |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-08-01 11:58:34
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-01 11:48 ` [Bug c++/23171] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-01 11:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-22  5:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-22 11:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-22  5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-22 05:15 -------
How does the C front end represent this expression?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-08-22  5:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-22 11:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-04 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-22 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-22 11:46 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> How does the C front end represent this expression?

Using a COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR which should solve this and PR 23172.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-08-22 11:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-04 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-09 16:57 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-04 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-04 17:27 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > How does the C front end represent this expression?
> 
> Using a COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR which should solve this and PR 23172.

And PR 20103.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-09-04 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-09 16:57 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-09 17:01 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-09 17:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-09 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-09 16:57 -------
The testcase starts failing with this patch from zadeck and dberlin:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg00635.html

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-09-09 16:57 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-09 17:01 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-09 17:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-09 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-09 17:00 -------
It's a latent FE  bug, hopefully one that an FE person can solve.
It's out of my FE experience league, unfortunately.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/23171] [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization
  2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-09-09 17:01 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-09 17:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-09 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-09 17:00 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> The testcase starts failing with this patch from zadeck and dberlin:
It was decided this was really a latent front-end bug. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-09 17:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-01 10:53 [Bug c++/23171] New: [4.1 Regression] ICE on pointer initialization reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 11:48 ` [Bug c++/23171] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 11:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-22  5:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-22 11:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-04 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 16:57 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 17:01 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 17:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).