public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider "m" alternatives Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:46:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20050801184645.10639.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20050112133406.19398.uros@kss-loka.si> ------- Additional Comments From dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01 18:46 ------- This is very close to the problem I ran into reported here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-07/msg01084.html That one is fixed by the combination of the patch in PR 19653 and the patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-07/msg01123.html However that is insufficient to fix this case. The difficulty is that regmove causes the same pseudo to be used for the operands and the result of the multiply. Consider that reg as all one, ST(0) is the best place for it, and you get the extra move. If you turn off regmove, the patches above fix this problem. Maybe we should do that? It seems like the register allocator should be doing what regmove is trying to do. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 18:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-01-12 13:34 [Bug target/19398] New: Non-optimal code with cvttss2si uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-01-12 15:56 ` [Bug target/19398] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18 11:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider "m" alternatives rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18 12:22 ` uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-03-15 10:10 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-15 11:44 ` bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de 2005-03-15 12:23 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-15 12:35 ` uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-08-01 18:46 ` dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2005-08-08 9:58 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 10:17 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-19398-1649@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-10-21 19:27 ` uros at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-19398-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2012-10-27 8:14 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 18:34 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 18:03 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:30 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20050801184645.10639.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).