public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050801204316.12463.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050730230931.23153.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>
------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-01 20:43 -------
-fno-tree-dominator-opts does not seem to have a great influence.
text data bss dec hex filename
181547 14052 6684 202283 3162b 4.1-nodopts-O2-i386/xterm
195088 14056 6684 215828 34b14 4.1-nodopts-O2-i686/xterm
156043 14052 6684 176779 2b28b 4.1-nodopts-Os-i386/xterm
156459 14052 6684 177195 2b42b 4.1-nodopts-Os-i686/xterm
175627 21724 6684 204035 31d03 4.0-nodopts-O2-i386/xterm
189704 21728 6684 218116 35404 4.0-nodopts-O2-i686/xterm
150191 21724 6684 178599 2b9a7 4.0-nodopts-Os-i386/xterm
150567 21724 6684 178975 2bb1f 4.0-nodopts-Os-i686/xterm
Looking over a few files it does not look like there's a big difference
between the tree dumps for 4.1 and 4.0 (the .vars dumps), so I would guess the
some change at the rtl level is responsible for the size increase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-07-31 0:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 18:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23153] " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-01 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 20:43 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu [this message]
2005-08-08 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 0:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-11 9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-19 21:50 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-19 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-19 22:06 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050801204316.12463.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).