* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2005-08-02 0:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 0:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-02 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 00:37 -------
Confirmed, this makes hard to debug on powerpc-darwin and powerpc-aix.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |wrong-debug
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-02 00:37:12
date| |
Summary|debug info omitted for |[4.0/4.1 Regression] debug
|uninitialized variables |info omitted for
| |uninitialized variables
| |(stabs)
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
2005-08-02 0:37 ` [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-02 0:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-02 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 00:40 -------
It is obvious the debug info is not being outputted for stabs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
2005-08-02 0:37 ` [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 0:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-02 0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 3:25 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-02 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 00:42 -------
Actually the PR 21828 was orginally about stabs and not about dwarf-2:
"When using gdb-309 and gdb-370 on MacOS X 10.3.9, even the simplest queries seem broken." so
really PR 21828 should never been closed until the stabs problem was fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-02 3:25 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-08-02 16:52 ` dpatel at apple dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-08-02 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-08-02 03:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for
uninitialized variables (stabs)
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 00:42 -------
> Actually the PR 21828 was orginally about stabs and not about dwarf-2:
> "When using gdb-309 and gdb-370 on MacOS X 10.3.9, even the simplest queries seem broken." so
> really PR 21828 should never been closed until the stabs problem was fixed.
Then the test case in the PR (which you provided) should not have used
DWARF-2. I rely on the bugmasters to reduce bugs -- and they do a great
job.
In any case, the problem is now either in the C front end or in the DBX
generator. Since the DWARF-2 generators do something reasonable,
AFAICT, I would guess the problem is in either the DBX generator, or the
GDB reader for STABS, or in the STABS format itself.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 3:25 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-08-02 16:52 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2005-08-02 17:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2005-08-02 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-08-02 16:52 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
On Aug 1, 2005, at 8:25 PM, mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> In any case, the problem is now either in the C front end or in the
> DBX
> generator. Since the DWARF-2 generators do something reasonable,
> AFAICT, I would guess the problem is in either the DBX generator,
> or the
> GDB reader for STABS, or in the STABS format itself.
This does not look like STABS or DWARF-2 specific. Right now it
does work even in DWARF-2 mode also. With the attached patch it DWARF-2
also works.
GCC Mainline ===
Using stabs ===
Reading symbols for shared libraries .. done
Breakpoint 1 at 0x1d9c: file /tmp/t.c, line 6.
type = <unknown type>
type = <unknown type>
$1 = <unknown type>
$2 = <unknown type>
Using DWARF ===
Reading symbols for shared libraries .. done
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2d04: file /tmp/t.c, line 6.
type = <unknown type>
type = int
$1 = <unknown type>
$2 = 0
GCC Mainline with fix===
Using stabs ===
Reading symbols for shared libraries .. done
Breakpoint 1 at 0x1d9c: file /tmp/t.c, line 6.
type = int
type = int
$1 = 0
$2 = 0
Using DWARF ===
Reading symbols for shared libraries .. done
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2d04: file /tmp/t.c, line 6.
type = int
type = int
$1 = 0
$2 = 0
-
Devang
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 16:52 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2005-08-02 17:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 17:12 ` dpatel at apple dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-02 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 17:00 -------
Devang --
The DWARF-2 information looks correct to me, from the section of DWARF-2 code
that you posted in the original report for this bug. I know GDB doesn't print
the variable, but I don't think that's the compiler's fault; the information
looks OK. Is there something wrong with the DWARF-2 generated, or is this just
a GDB bug?
I'm not oppposed to making the kind of change you're proposing for the C front
end; I suggested the same thing. But, it is a complex change; as you've noted,
there are regressions when you try it.
-- Mark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 17:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-02 17:12 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2005-08-02 17:16 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2005-08-02 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-08-02 17:12 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:00 AM, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2005-08-02 17:00 -------
> Devang --
>
> The DWARF-2 information looks correct to me, from the section of
> DWARF-2 code
> that you posted in the original report for this bug. I know GDB
> doesn't print
> the variable, but I don't think that's the compiler's fault; the
> information
> looks OK. Is there something wrong with the DWARF-2 generated, or
> is this just
> a GDB bug?
Without the patch, GCC does not emit DW_OP_addr and DW_AT_location.
> I'm not oppposed to making the kind of change you're proposing for
> the C front
> end; I suggested the same thing. But, it is a complex change; as
> you've noted,
> there are regressions when you try it.
There is only one regression. One way to avoid it is to split
wrapup_global...
in two halves. One to emit code and second to generate debug info.
This allows
C front end to put cgraph_optimize() after writing globals but before
generating debug info.
thoughts ?
-
Devang
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 17:12 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2005-08-02 17:16 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-08-02 17:21 ` dpatel at apple dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-08-02 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-08-02 17:16 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for
uninitialized variables (stabs)
dpatel at apple dot com wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-08-02 17:12 -------
> Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
>
>
> On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:00 AM, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
>>------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
>>2005-08-02 17:00 -------
>>Devang --
>>
>>The DWARF-2 information looks correct to me, from the section of
>>DWARF-2 code
>>that you posted in the original report for this bug. I know GDB
>>doesn't print
>>the variable, but I don't think that's the compiler's fault; the
>>information
>>looks OK. Is there something wrong with the DWARF-2 generated, or
>>is this just
>>a GDB bug?
>
>
> Without the patch, GCC does not emit DW_OP_addr and DW_AT_location.
Yes -- but that's no excuse for GDB not being able to show us the type!
> There is only one regression. One way to avoid it is to split
> wrapup_global...
> in two halves. One to emit code and second to generate debug info.
> This allows
> C front end to put cgraph_optimize() after writing globals but before
> generating debug info.
It sounds sensible enough, but I really haven't studied how the C front
end does things well enough to know for sure. I would ask Joseph and RTH.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 17:16 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-08-02 17:21 ` dpatel at apple dot com
2005-09-08 2:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dpatel at apple dot com @ 2005-08-02 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-08-02 17:21 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:16 AM, mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> It sounds sensible enough, but I really haven't studied how the C
> front
> end does things well enough to know for sure. I would ask Joseph
> and RTH.
OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-02 17:21 ` dpatel at apple dot com
@ 2005-09-08 2:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-08 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-08 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-08-02 00:37:12 |2005-09-08 02:39:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-08 2:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-08 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 0:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-08 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 02:42 -------
A more severe example is gdb.base/call-ar-st.c wherein the local static variable
"double_array" is not put to the debug info at all. Not even its name as in the
example here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-08 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-09 0:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 0:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 1:08 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-09 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 00:47 -------
Subject: Bug 23190
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: rth@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-09 00:47:05
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-decl.c cgraphunit.c langhooks.c
passes.c toplev.c toplev.h
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c decl2.c
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug: 20050907-1.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2: var1.c var2.c
Log message:
PR debug/23190
* toplev.c (wrapup_global_declaration_1): Split out ...
(wrapup_global_declaration_2): ... from ...
(wrapup_global_declarations): ... here. Return bool.
(check_global_declaration_1): Split out ...
(check_global_declarations): from here.
(emit_debug_global_declarations): New.
* toplev.h (wrapup_global_declaration_1, wrapup_global_declaration_2,
check_global_declaration_1, emit_debug_global_declarations): Declare.
* c-decl.c (c_write_global_declarations_1): Don't create a vector
of decls. Call wrapup_global_declaration_1,
wrapup_global_declaration_2, check_global_declaration_1 directly.
(c_write_global_declarations_2): New.
(ext_block): New.
(c_write_global_declarations): Call c_write_global_declarations_2.
* langhooks.c (write_global_declarations): Call
emit_debug_global_declarations.
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_varpool_remove_unreferenced_decls): Don't
remove decls that have DECL_RTL_SET_P.
* passes.c (rest_of_decl_compilation): Invoke
cgraph_varpool_finalize_decl for all but functions.
cp/
* decl.c (wrapup_globals_for_namespace): Call
emit_debug_global_declarations.
* decl2.c (cp_finish_file): Likewise.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.9920&r2=2.9921
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.683&r2=1.684
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.127&r2=1.128
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/langhooks.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.84&r2=1.85
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/passes.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.110&r2=2.111
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/toplev.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.974&r2=1.975
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/toplev.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.141&r2=1.142
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4879&r2=1.4880
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1423&r2=1.1424
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.798&r2=1.799
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/20050907-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/var1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/var2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-09 0:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-09 0:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-09 1:08 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-09 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 00:52 -------
Subject: Bug 23190
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: rth@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-09 00:51:59
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-decl.c langhooks.c toplev.c
toplev.h
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl.c decl2.c
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug: 20050907-1.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2: var1.c var2.c
Log message:
PR debug/23190
* toplev.c (wrapup_global_declaration_1): Split out ...
(wrapup_global_declaration_2): ... from ...
(wrapup_global_declarations): ... here. Return bool.
(check_global_declaration_1): Split out ...
(check_global_declarations): from here.
(emit_debug_global_declarations): New.
* toplev.h (wrapup_global_declaration_1, wrapup_global_declaration_2,
check_global_declaration_1, emit_debug_global_declarations): Declare.
* c-decl.c (c_write_global_declarations_1): Don't create a vector
of decls. Call wrapup_global_declaration_1,
wrapup_global_declaration_2, check_global_declaration_1 directly.
(c_write_global_declarations_2): New.
(ext_block): New.
(c_write_global_declarations): Call c_write_global_declarations_2.
* langhooks.c (write_global_declarations): Call
emit_debug_global_declarations.
cp/
* decl.c (wrapup_globals_for_namespace): Call
emit_debug_global_declarations.
* decl2.c (cp_finish_file): Likewise.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.7592.2.420&r2=2.7592.2.421
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.630.6.17&r2=1.630.6.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/langhooks.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.81.2.1&r2=1.81.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/toplev.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.944.2.5&r2=1.944.2.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/toplev.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.133&r2=1.133.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.4648.2.96&r2=1.4648.2.97
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.1371.2.21&r2=1.1371.2.22
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.770.2.6&r2=1.770.2.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/20050907-1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/var1.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/var2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
2005-08-02 0:34 [Bug debug/23190] New: debug info omitted for uninitialized variables dpatel at apple dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-09 0:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-09 1:08 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-09 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 01:08 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread