From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9168 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2005 18:04:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9122 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2005 18:04:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050804180403.9121.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040413135721.14940.ian@airs.com> References: <20040413135721.14940.ian@airs.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug pch/14940] PCH largefile test fails on various platforms X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-08-04 18:04 ------- Subject: Re: PCH largefile test fails on various platforms > My patch added the largefile test to the 3.4 branch. I don't think that failing > a new test can be called a regression. I expect that the compiler would have > failed the test before, too, it's just that nobody knew about it. Ok. > I would be in favor of backporting to 3.4 any HP/UX fix which fixes the > largefile test. But since I don't think it's a regression I don't think it's on > my plate to do that. I will probably do it if nobody else does, but not very soon. I'll try to find the time to test the change in the next few days. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940