public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
@ 2005-05-12  9:42 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
  2005-05-12 10:39 ` [Bug c/21529] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr @ 2005-05-12  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Compiling this code with -Os is more than 40 % bigger in size with GCC-4.1
compared to GCC-3.4.3.
See also thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00532.html
>>>>
struct disk_interface_str {
    unsigned    nb_IDE_found;
    struct IDE_found_str {
        unsigned short  ideIOadr;
        unsigned short  ideIOctrladr;
        unsigned char   irq;
        unsigned char   bios_order;
        unsigned short  reserved;
        } *IDE_found;
    } DI;

void reorder_IDE_for_linux (void)
  {
  static const unsigned short idearray[] = {
        0x1F0, 0x170,
        0x1E8, 0x168,
        0x1E0, 0x160,
        };
  unsigned short cpt, order;

  for (order = 0; order < sizeof(idearray)/sizeof(idearray[0]); order++) {
      for (cpt = order + 1; cpt < DI.nb_IDE_found; cpt++)
          if (DI.IDE_found[cpt].ideIOadr == idearray[order])
              break;
      if (cpt < DI.nb_IDE_found) {
          struct IDE_found_str save = DI.IDE_found[cpt];
          unsigned short i;

          for (i = order; i < cpt; i++) {
              struct IDE_found_str tmp = DI.IDE_found[i];
              DI.IDE_found[i] = save;
              save = tmp;
              }
          DI.IDE_found[cpt] = save;
          }
      }
  }
<<<<

-- 
           Summary: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to
                    4.1
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i486-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i486-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i486-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/21529] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
@ 2005-05-12 10:39 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-12 11:48 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-12 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-12 10:39 -------
Yada yada yada, you know the drill.  SRA, out-of-ssa, and register 
allocation all working against each other: 
 
<L6>:; 
  D.1605 = DI.IDE_found + (struct IDE_found_str *) ((long unsigned int) i * 
8); 
  tmp$reserved = D.1605->reserved; 
  tmp$bios_order = D.1605->bios_order; 
  tmp$irq = D.1605->irq; 
  tmp$ideIOctrladr = D.1605->ideIOctrladr; 
  tmp$ideIOadr = D.1605->ideIOadr; 
  D.1605->reserved = save$reserved; 
  D.1605->bios_order = save$bios_order; 
  D.1605->irq = save$irq; 
  D.1605->ideIOctrladr = save$ideIOctrladr; 
  D.1605->ideIOadr = save$ideIOadr; 
  i = i + 1; 
  save$reserved = tmp$reserved; 
  save$bios_order = tmp$bios_order; 
  save$irq = tmp$irq; 
  save$ideIOctrladr = tmp$ideIOctrladr; 
  save$ideIOadr = tmp$ideIOadr; 
 
Wouldn't a block move be more efficient here than moving things one-by-one? 
 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |ra
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-05-12 10:39:02
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/21529] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
  2005-05-12 10:39 ` [Bug c/21529] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-12 11:48 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-05-12 13:41 ` [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-05-12 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2005-05-12 11:48 -------
Maybe SRA could be tuned differently for -Os. RTH, do you think it is feasable, 
or is it only a register allocator problem and should not be handled at the 
tree level at all?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
  2005-05-12 10:39 ` [Bug c/21529] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-12 11:48 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-05-12 13:41 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-05-20 15:49 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-05-12 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |4.0.0 4.1.0
      Known to work|                            |3.4.3
            Summary|code size regression (+40%) |[4.0/4.1 Regression] code
                   |with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to  |size regression (+40%) with
                   |4.1                         |-Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-12 13:41 ` [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-05-20 15:49 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-05-20 15:50 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-05-20 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2005-05-20 15:49 -------
*** Bug 21680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-20 15:49 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-05-20 15:50 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-07-08  1:38 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-05-20 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2005-05-20 15:50 -------
Notice that both testcases come from the same program (Gujin).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-20 15:50 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-07-08  1:38 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-04 22:54 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-08  1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.0.1                       |4.0.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-08  1:38 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-04 22:54 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-05  2:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-04 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2005-05-12 10:39:02         |2005-08-04 22:54:19
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-08-04 22:54 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-05  2:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-05 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-05 20:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-05  2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-05 02:42 -------
Subject: Bug 21529

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Changes by:	rth@gcc.gnu.org	2005-08-05 02:42:07

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog params.def params.h tree-sra.c 

Log message:
	PR 21529
	* params.def (PARAM_SRA_MAX_STRUCTURE_COUNT): New.
	* params.h (SRA_MAX_STRUCTURE_COUNT): New.
	* tree-sra.c (decide_block_copy): Use it.  Disable element copy
	if we'd have to instantiate too many members.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.9660&r2=2.9661
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/params.def.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.65&r2=1.66
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/params.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-sra.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.69&r2=2.70



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-08-05 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-05 20:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-05 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-05 20:39 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1
  2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-08-05  2:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-05 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-08-05 20:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-05 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-05 20:39 -------
Subject: Bug 21529

CVSROOT:	/cvs/gcc
Module name:	gcc
Branch: 	gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by:	rth@gcc.gnu.org	2005-08-05 20:39:05

Modified files:
	gcc            : ChangeLog params.def params.h tree-sra.c 

Log message:
	PR 21529
	* params.def (PARAM_SRA_MAX_STRUCTURE_COUNT): New.
	* params.h (SRA_MAX_STRUCTURE_COUNT): New.
	* tree-sra.c (decide_block_copy): Use it.  Disable element copy
	if we'd have to instantiate too many members.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.7592.2.353&r2=2.7592.2.354
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/params.def.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.54.6.2&r2=1.54.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/params.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.28&r2=1.28.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-sra.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.53.2.2&r2=2.53.2.3



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-05 20:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-12  9:42 [Bug c/21529] New: code size regression (+40%) with -Os from GCC-3.4.3 to 4.1 etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr
2005-05-12 10:39 ` [Bug c/21529] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-12 11:48 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-05-12 13:41 ` [Bug middle-end/21529] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-05-20 15:49 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-05-20 15:50 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-07-08  1:38 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 22:54 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-05  2:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-05 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-05 20:39 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).