public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] New: tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional @ 2005-07-17 17:20 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 18:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22525] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-17 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs The testcase is gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c. It only happens when profile use is used. Note this is worse if we use unsigned long long instead as we get a size mismatch. See PR 22368 for the patch to catch this (the second patch): /Users/pinskia/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c: In function 'main':^M /Users/pinskia/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c:25: error: types mismatch in comparsion^M unsigned intD.3^M intD.0^M PROF.4D.1300 != 0;^M ^M /Users/pinskia/src/local/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c:25: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed^M Please submit a full bug report,^M with preprocessed source if appropriate.^M See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.^M -- Summary: tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org OtherBugsDependingO 22368 nThis: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional 2005-07-17 17:20 [Bug tree-optimization/22525] New: tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-17 18:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 3:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 12:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-17 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 17:53 ------- Created an attachment (id=9295) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9295&action=view) patch which I need to test (from Honza) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional 2005-07-17 17:20 [Bug tree-optimization/22525] New: tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 18:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22525] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-08 3:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 12:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-08 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 03:18 ------- Confirmed, will test the patch now. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-08 03:18:05 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional 2005-07-17 17:20 [Bug tree-optimization/22525] New: tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 18:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22525] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 3:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-08 12:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-08 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 12:31 ------- And yes the patch fixes the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional [not found] <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2006-04-19 8:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-19 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 08:39 ------- I have a patch (and found this bug "too late"). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-11-11 18:23:35 |2006-04-19 08:39:25 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional [not found] <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-04-19 8:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-24 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-24 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 07:58 ------- Subject: Bug 22525 Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 24 07:58:53 2006 New Revision: 113216 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113216 Log: 2006-04-24 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> PR tree-optimization/22525 * value-prof.c (tree_mod_pow2): Remove unnecessary temporary variable, adjust types of generated expressions. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/value-prof.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional [not found] <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-04-19 8:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-24 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 19:29 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2006-04-26 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-24 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 08:36 ------- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional [not found] <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2006-04-24 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-25 19:29 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2006-04-26 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: brett dot albertson at stratech dot com @ 2006-04-25 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #7 from brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2006-04-25 19:29 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Fixed. > After this patch was applied onto trunk, the following test started failing on Solaris x86: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c scan-tree-dump n \+ \-1 All the other val-prof-2.c tests PASS. Any ideas? Brett Albertson -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22525] tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional [not found] <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2006-04-25 19:29 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com @ 2006-04-26 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-26 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 07:59 ------- Sorry, I fixed that in a followup. -1 is now unsigned and so appears as n + fffffffffff. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22525 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-26 7:59 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-07-17 17:20 [Bug tree-optimization/22525] New: tree based value profiling (-fprofile-use) produces mismatch types in conditional pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 18:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22525] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 3:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08 12:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-22525-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-04-19 8:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 19:29 ` brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2006-04-26 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).