From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-153519-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14751 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2005 08:45:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14732 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2005 08:44:55 -0000
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050808084455.14731.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050808062659.23282.jv244@cam.ac.uk>
References: <20050808062659.23282.jv244@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/23282] [4.0 Regression] wrong results at -O on x86
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00798.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-08 08:44 -------
GCC 4.0.2 (CVS) does this:  
  
ivcanon dump:  
  
  # b_9 = PHI <b_3(1)>;  
<L2>:;  
  if (b_9 != -1) goto <L3>; else goto <L4>;  
  
<L3>:;  
  printf (&"%d\n"[0], b_9);  
  abort ();  
  
  
.ivopts dump:  
  # b_9 = PHI <b_3(1)>;  
<L2>:;  
  if (b_9 != -1) goto <L3>; else goto <L4>;  
  
<L3>:;  
  printf (&"%d\n"[0], b_9);  
  abort ();  
  
  
Looks like final value replacement screws up.  
  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23282