From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-153525-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7774 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2005 10:17:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7757 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2005 10:17:31 -0000
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050808101731.7756.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050112133406.19398.uros@kss-loka.si>
References: <20050112133406.19398.uros@kss-loka.si>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider "m" alternatives
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00804.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-08 10:17 -------
... though this would not help PR17236, of course.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398