From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17144 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2005 17:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16993 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2005 17:03:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050808170302.16991.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "aph at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050222215734.20155.gerald@pfeifer.com> References: <20050222215734.20155.gerald@pfeifer.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/20155] [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long" X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00835.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-08-08 17:03 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long" bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > > Andrew, is a backport fine with you? Yes. Go for it. Andrew. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155