From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30990 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2005 19:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30526 invoked by uid 48); 9 Aug 2005 19:57:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050809195742.30525.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jacob dot navia at ants dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050807195054.23278.jacob.navia@ants.com> References: <20050807195054.23278.jacob.navia@ants.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/23278] SJLJ-exceptions broken X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg01013.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-09 19:57 ------- If I can't mix SJLJ exceptions with DWARF2 exceptions how this is supposed to work? I mean I have to rebuild all libraries including libc, libm, and whatever???? This can't be. Besides, why this mixing should lead to the address of a function being stored in the high 32 bits of a 64 bit address? Has anyone used SJLJ exceptions under linux? Thanks in advance. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23278