From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3889 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2005 12:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3375 invoked by uid 48); 11 Aug 2005 12:24:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050811122409.3374.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050811080838.23324.lindig@cs.uni-sb.de> References: <20050811080838.23324.lindig@cs.uni-sb.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/23324] [4.1 Regression] unsigned bitfield in struct not accessed correctly X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg01194.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-11 12:24 ------- Oh, and this is related to how we inline and then also inline the values of the static const variables (with -ftree-store-ccp). -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.1 Regression] unsigned |[4.1 Regression] unsigned |bitfield in struct not |bitfield in struct not |passed correctly as argument|accessed correctly http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23324