public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/12527] [3.3/3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050815093701.16477.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031006200259.12527.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15 09:37 -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> doko's patch triggers PR23256. gcc 3.3.3 on armeb appears to miscompile itself
> when SUBTARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is TARGET_CPU_arm6, but with TARGET_CPU_arm7tdmi it
> all works fine.
I think this is more likely to be PR 22528.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-15 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-06 20:03 [Bug target/12527] New: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-10-09 1:43 ` [Bug target/12527] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-11 3:32 ` [Bug target/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-11 11:34 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
2003-10-11 12:06 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-12 7:24 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
2003-10-13 12:41 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-13 20:56 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
2003-10-14 4:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-14 6:51 ` doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
2003-10-14 9:52 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-14 20:49 ` debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2003-10-15 13:30 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-15 14:30 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-21 3:28 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-10 22:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-12 16:12 ` [Bug bootstrap/12527] " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-12 16:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-12 17:05 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-14 9:18 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-14 9:26 ` rearnsha at arm dot com
2004-01-14 17:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-14 17:56 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-27 13:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-30 20:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-30 21:17 ` [Bug bootstrap/12527] [3.3/3.4 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-14 18:53 ` buytenh at wantstofly dot org
2005-08-15 9:37 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050815093701.16477.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).