From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20178 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2005 08:33:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20145 invoked by uid 48); 16 Aug 2005 08:33:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050816083343.20144.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050813180312.23378.martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de> References: <20050813180312.23378.martin@mpa-garching.mpg.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/23378] [4.1 Regression] code quality regression for complicated loop X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg01766.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2005-08-16 08:33 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Ouch. This badly needs reducing... Absolutely. But since Andrew pointed out that it is probably related to PR 23302 and PR 23303 (which have nice testcases), I suggest I wait until these are fixed. If, after that, the performance regression persists, I'll try to reduce the testcase. Is that OK? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23378