From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-155528-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28045 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2005 16:14:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27417 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2005 16:13:14 -0000
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:15:00 -0000
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20050824161308.23547.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/23547] New: [4.1 regression] ICE with recursive call to nested function
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg02807.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The following valid code snippet causes an ICE on mainline when compiled
with "--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0":

==================
void foo()
{
  void bar()
  {
    bar();
  }
}
==================

Apparently there's something wrong with recursive calls to nested functions.

-- 
           Summary: [4.1 regression] ICE with recursive call to nested
                    function
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23547