From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9759 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2005 16:39:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9560 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2005 16:38:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050824163842.9555.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050712160406.22444.hp@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050712160406.22444.hp@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22444] [4.1 regression] testsuite failure:23_containers/set/explicit_instantiation/{1,2,3}.cc ICE X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg02811.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-24 16:38 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > This has been failing on x86/linux for the last two months. Any ETA on a fix? The issue is that this is very dependent on what is built. > If not, is there a patch that can get reverted to fix this? I almost think this is a C++ front-end bug with some GC bug but I cannot prove it. In some cases 1.cc also fails too with the same ICE. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.1 regression] testsuite |[4.1 regression] testsuite |failure:23_containers/set/ex|failure:23_containers/set/ex |plicit_instantiation/{2,3}.c|plicit_instantiation/{1,2,3} |c ICE |.cc ICE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22444