public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
@ 2005-07-12 6:44 akr at m17n dot org
2005-07-12 7:04 ` [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: akr at m17n dot org @ 2005-07-12 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I found that following program exits with 1 instead of 0.
% cat z.c
int f(int n)
{
if (-1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823)
return 1;
return 0;
}
int main()
{
return f(1073741824);
}
% /home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/gcc -v -O z.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/akr/ruby/chkbuild/tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449
--enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050712 (experimental)
/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/cc1
-quiet -v -iprefix
/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/
z.c -quiet -dumpbase z.c -mtune=pentiumpro -auxbase z -O -version -o /tmp/cc3anyqv.s
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring duplicate directory
"/home/akr/ruby/chkbuild/tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/home/akr/ruby/chkbuild/tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/include
/usr/local/include
/home/akr/ruby/chkbuild/tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 4.1.0 20050712 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.1.0 20050712 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
Compiler executable checksum: cab36206423b633931a3bd43d355747c
as -V -Qy -o /tmp/ccUCeuxU.o /tmp/cc3anyqv.s
GNU assembler version 2.15 (i386-linux) using BFD version 2.15
/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/collect2
--eh-frame-hdr -m elf_i386 -dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /usr/lib/crt1.o
/usr/lib/crti.o
/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/crtbegin.o
-L/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0
-L/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc
-L/home/akr/ruby/chkbuild/tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0
-L/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/../../..
-L/home/akr/ruby/chkbuild/tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/../../..
/tmp/ccUCeuxU.o -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed
-lgcc_s --no-as-needed
/home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.0/crtend.o
/usr/lib/crtn.o
% ./a.out
zsh: exit 1 ./a.out
It exists with 0 if optimization is disabled.
% /home/src/chkbuild-tmp/build/gcc-trunk/20050712T134449/bin/gcc z.c
% ./a.out
--
Summary: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is
1073741824
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: akr at m17n dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
2005-07-12 6:44 [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824 akr at m17n dot org
@ 2005-07-12 7:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-12 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 06:54 -------
4.0 produced:
D.1463 = n - -1073741824;
if (D.1463 >= 0)
Which is wrong as overflow is undefined.
4.1 produces:
(n >= -1073741824)
as overflow is undefined.
This was exposed by:
2005-07-02 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
PR middle-end/14490
* fold-const.c (fold_binary): Handle the return value of
fold_to_nonsharp_ineq_using_bound if we get back the same operand back.
Implement "X +- C1 CMP C2" folding to "X CMP C2 -+ C1".
Which means I have to look into it since I exposed it. We should be subtracting using unsigned mode.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c |middle-end
Ever Confirmed| |1
GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to fail| |4.1.0
Known to work| |4.0.2
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-12 06:54:16
date| |
Summary|-1073741824 <= n && n <= |[4.1 Regression] -1073741824
|1073741823 is true where n |<= n && n <= 1073741823 is
|is 1073741824 |true where n is 1073741824
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
2005-07-12 6:44 [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824 akr at m17n dot org
2005-07-12 7:04 ` [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-12 7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 16:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-12 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 07:04 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> 4.0 produced:
> D.1463 = n - -1073741824;
> if (D.1463 >= 0)
>
> Which is wrong as overflow is undefined.
This shows that fold is doing something wrong:
void abort(void);
int f(int n)
{
if (n< 0)
return 1;
n+=1073741824;
return n >= 0;
}
int main()
{
if (f(1073741824))
abort ();
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
2005-07-12 6:44 [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824 akr at m17n dot org
2005-07-12 7:04 ` [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-12 16:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 22:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-27 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-12 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 16:18 -------
I have a fix, the problem is that build_range_check depends on wrapping on signed types being defined
which is not correct.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
2005-07-12 6:44 [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824 akr at m17n dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-12 16:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-12 22:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-27 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-12 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 22:56 -------
Patch posted here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00879.html>.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2005-
| |07/msg00879.html
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
2005-07-12 6:44 [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824 akr at m17n dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-12 22:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-27 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-27 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-02 21:44 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-02 21:47 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:47 -------
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-02 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-02 21:44 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:47 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:44 -------
Subject: Bug 22429
Author: rth
Date: Wed Nov 2 21:44:17 2005
New Revision: 106400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106400
Log:
PR 22429
* fold-const.c (build_range_check): Use unsigned when signed
overflow is undefined also. If etype is subtype, make sure that
the subtraction is in the supertype.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr22429.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-31 4:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-02 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:44 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:47 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-10-16 21:48:15 |2005-11-02 02:42:01
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-22 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 4:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:03 -------
This is a showstopper; wrong code on a primary platform using plausible inputs.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-13 16:12 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
@ 2005-10-22 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-22 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 21:55 -------
I am no longer working on this and my machine went bust today, sorry. If
someone wants to take my patch and fix up for future comments, please do.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-13 16:09 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-13 16:12 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-10-22 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu @ 2005-10-13 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:12 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true
where n is 1073741824
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09 -------
> As in:
>
> if (value != 0
> && (!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
> && (flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
>
> which in turn means
>
> if (value != 0
> && (flag_wrapv ? TREE_OVERFLOW (value) : !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
That is what my patch does.
The extra stuff was needed to make sure that Ada would be able to bootstrap.
-- Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
2005-10-13 16:09 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-13 16:12 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2005-10-13 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09 -------
> As in:
>
> if (value != 0
> && (!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
> && (flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
>
> which in turn means
>
> if (value != 0
> && (flag_wrapv ? TREE_OVERFLOW (value) : !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
That is what my patch does.
The extra stuff was needed to make sure that Ada would be able to bootstrap.
-- Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 15:59 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:05 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-13 16:09 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-10-13 16:12 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-13 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09 -------
As in:
if (value != 0
&& (!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
&& (flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
which in turn means
if (value != 0
&& (flag_wrapv ? TREE_OVERFLOW (value) : !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 15:59 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-13 16:05 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:09 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-13 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:05 -------
Sorry, let me rephrase. Could build_range_check not cast to the unsigned type
if flag_wrapv?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-13 15:59 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:05 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-13 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:59 -------
Why can't build_range_check first cast to an unsigned type?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-02 21:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-12 6:44 [Bug c/22429] New: -1073741824 <= n && n <= 1073741823 is true where n is 1073741824 akr at m17n dot org
2005-07-12 7:04 ` [Bug middle-end/22429] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 7:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 16:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-12 22:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-27 15:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-22429-2489@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 15:59 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:05 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:09 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-13 16:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2005-10-13 16:12 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2005-10-22 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:03 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 2:42 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:44 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:47 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).