From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-155938-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6722 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2005 20:37:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6714 invoked by uid 48); 28 Aug 2005 20:37:46 -0000
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050828203746.6713.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050828200424.23605.kevin@planetsaphire.com>
References: <20050828200424.23605.kevin@planetsaphire.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg03217.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-28 20:37 -------
inlining memset is not an optimization as most OS's memsets are better than the inlined version, using 
sse registers,etc.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23605