From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7041 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2005 10:16:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6980 invoked by uid 48); 31 Aug 2005 10:16:46 -0000 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050831101646.6979.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050828164012.23602.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20050828164012.23602.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg03557.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2005-08-31 10:16 ------- tracked down the 15 failures to this patch: 2005-06-14 Tom Tromey PR libgcj/19877: * no-executables.m4: Call real AC_FUNC_MMAP when cache variable is set but not 'no'. 2005-06-14 Tom Tromey PR libgcj/19877: * configure, aclocal.m4, Makefile.in: Rebuilt. looking at the generated libjava/Makefile, the only interesting difference is -BACKTRACESPEC = -fno-omit-frame-pointer +BACKTRACESPEC = -fomit-frame-pointer but that macro isn't used anywhere. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23602