From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26275 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2005 12:38:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24829 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2005 12:36:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050831123621.24828.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050322183707.20592.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> References: <20050322183707.20592.Thomas.Koenig@online.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/20592] -fno-automatic (g77 option) is missing from gfortran. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg03573.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 12:36 ------- Subject: Bug 20592 CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc Module name: gcc Changes by: fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org 2005-08-31 12:31:36 Modified files: gcc/fortran : ChangeLog gfortran.h invoke.texi lang.opt options.c resolve.c Log message: PR fortran/20592 * gfortran.h (gfc_option_t): Add flag_automatic. * invoke.texi: Document the -fno-automatic option. * lang.opt: Add a -fautomatic option. * options.c (gfc_init_options): Default for -fautomatic is on. (gfc_handle_option): Add handling of -fautomatic option. * resolve.c (gfc_resolve): When -fno-automatic is used, mark needed variables as SAVE. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.534&r2=1.535 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.83&r2=1.84 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.20&r2=1.21 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/lang.opt.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.17&r2=1.18 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/options.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.23&r2=1.24 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.51&r2=1.52 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20592