From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-156348-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13998 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2005 16:23:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13868 invoked by uid 48); 31 Aug 2005 16:23:23 -0000
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:24:00 -0000
From: "gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20050831162320.23658.gdr@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/23658] New: bogus warning for missing return value
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg03627.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The testcase below was distilled from GMP source code (thanks to TG).
Consider

  inline int foo (void){ if (1) return 0; }
  int bar () { return foo (); }

compile with "-Wall -O2 -c".  Gcc spits out

tg.c: In function 'bar':
tg.c:2: warning: control may reach end of non-void function 'foo' being inlined

which clearly is bogus as the branch is *always* taken.

-- 
           Summary: bogus warning for missing return value
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: platform independent


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23658