From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15039 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2005 01:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14860 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050901010846.14859.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050831205412.23662.ngmlinux@gmail.com> References: <20050831205412.23662.ngmlinux@gmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/23662] Binaries generated by arm-linux-gcj segfault on execution on arm target X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 01:08 ------- First don't add me to the CC, I read gcc-bugs. (In reply to comment #6) > Is it neccissary for the host-to-host version of gcc to be the exact same > version as the host-to-target gcc version being built? I doubt this is the case > as this would present major imcompatibility issues for many people. No. As I said this is a bug in boehm-gc, you might to see if you can use the latest version of boehm-gc on your target. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot | |org | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23662