From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2698 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2005 18:58:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2687 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2005 18:58:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 18:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050901185826.2686.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050901014856.23668.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050901014856.23668.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/23668] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/i386-sse-11.c and gcc.target/i386/pr13366.c fail X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 18:58 ------- ... but why didn't it happen before? The problem seems to be that ix86_expand_vector_init_one_var is creating an all-zero vector that isn't the same as CONST0_RTX, which is wrong, but the previous code did the same thing and didn't get this problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23668