From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6889 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 01:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6326 invoked by uid 48); 2 Sep 2005 01:50:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050902015036.6325.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050815021237.23393.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050815021237.23393.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/23393] catchall-1.m fails at -Os X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 01:50 ------- The interesting thing is that catchall-1.m fails now (along with local-variables-1.m): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00051.html But did less than a day ago: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00035.html But instead finally-1.m did. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |EH http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23393