From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21149 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 15:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20360 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 15:38:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050902153818.20353.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040603201220.15809.giese025@tc.umn.edu> References: <20040603201220.15809.giese025@tc.umn.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/15809] ICE Using Pointer Functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-09-02 15:38 ------- Subject: Re: ICE Using Pointer Functions erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi wrote: > Yes, it's the latter bug that Richard's patch fixes. > > I could add that I posted a patch to fix the other bug here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01861.html > I'm not yet sure if this is the best way to deal with the problem, though. I vaguely remember seeing a case where allowing a PARM_DECL fixed a bug, but wasn't still not quite right. I'll try to find out what this was (hopefully I'll have somethign written somewhere on it) - Tobi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15809