From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12583 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 16:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12434 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 16:12:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050902161206.12433.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050901014342.23667.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050901014342.23667.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/23667] [4.0/4.1 Regression] tr1/6_containers/unordered/hashtable/23465.cc execution test times out X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-02 16:12 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] tr1/6_containers/unordered/hashtable/23465.cc execution test times out On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote: > Hi. Can you have a quick look at what is going on outside the testsuite? (as > usual, just change testsuite_hooks.h to cassert and any VERIFY to assert). For > reference, on a P4-2400/linux running the test takes around 1/4 of sec, therefore > I suspect something is going seriously wrong in the compiler... But, if it's just > a matter of making the testcase a little simpler (on the border of timing out on > those platforms), not a big deal, just let me know. Running outside the testsuite, it appears to hang (taking at least 3min) on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, whereas by comparison on the same machine but configured for hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (32-bit rather than 64-bit) it takes 19s user time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23667