From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27918 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2005 22:09:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27815 invoked by uid 48); 2 Sep 2005 22:09:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050902220902.27814.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050828164012.23602.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20050828164012.23602.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 22:08 ------- I'm sure that the patches listed in comments #6 and #7 are bogus. But we've had problems before with unwinding with -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args (implied by -mtune=i486, implied by i486-linux), plus -fomit-frame-pointer. I assume this problem has returned. But since essentially no one uses this combination regularly, we don't know exactly when it failed. I'm trying to get reduced unwind test cases to fail. If that works, it'll be easier than looking at libjava itself. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23602