From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27161 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2005 03:08:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27140 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2005 03:08:43 -0000 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050904030843.27139.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050901014342.23667.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050901014342.23667.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/23667] [4.0/4.1 Regression] tr1/6_containers/unordered/hashtable/23465.cc execution test times out X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-04 03:08 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] tr1/6_containers/unordered/hashtable/23465.cc execution test times out pcarlini at suse dot de wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-03 23:06 ------- > (In reply to comment #14) > >>Yes, but that makes it no easier for me to test and debug the problem. > > > Hi, today I tried, quickly, but failed to find a simple testcase. Tomorrow, > I'll try again, harder. Thanks for taking care of this issue: as far as I'm > concerned, tr1/unordered* are completely broken (now that we sorted out the > most important bugs and would be seriously usable for 4.0.2 :( > And the issue seems serious in general, anyway. Definitely! One way or the other, I'll get this fixed, but I appreciate your help. Please do make sure that you've got the patch I checked in today; it's possible that patch magically fixed the problem. (We can hope!) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23667