From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31137 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2005 03:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30950 invoked by uid 48); 4 Sep 2005 03:25:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 03:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050904032523.30949.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ngmlinux at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050831205412.23662.ngmlinux@gmail.com> References: <20050831205412.23662.ngmlinux@gmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/23662] Binaries generated by arm-linux-gcj segfault on execution on arm target X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 03:25 ------- Ok after recompiling the static HelloWorld.exe with the patched toolchain the following happens upon execution on the target: ===code========================================================================== [root@ARMCore test]$ ./HelloWorld.exe HelloWorld.exe: dl-runtime.c:72: fixup: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xff) == 22' failed. Aborted ================================================================================= The following post although refering to a dated toolchain appears as though it may be relevant: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk/msg03071.html Does this seem to be on the right track? I'm noticing that in general, very few bugs if any in the arm-linux port of gcc have been fixed since the gcc-2.x.x and gcc-3.x.x toolchain releases. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23662