* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2005-08-31 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-31 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 19:49 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
GCC build triplet|powerpc64-linux |
GCC host triplet|powerpc64-linux |
GCC target triplet|powerpc64-linux |
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-31 19:49:03
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
2005-08-31 19:51 ` [Bug fortran/23661] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-31 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 23:34 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-31 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 23:10 -------
What happens is this:
In match_io we have the following code
if (gfc_match_char ('(') == MATCH_NO)
{
/* Treat the non-standard case of PRINT namelist. */
if (k == M_PRINT && (gfc_match_name (name) == MATCH_YES)
&& !gfc_find_symbol (name, NULL, 1, &sym)
&& (sym->attr.flavor == FL_NAMELIST))
This of course doesn't back up correctly in the case where a name is matched
which is not a namelist, then chaos ensues leading to the error you observed.
Since I approved the patch for this, I take it as may responsibility to fix this.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-08-31 19:49:03 |2005-08-31 23:10:30
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
2005-08-31 19:51 ` [Bug fortran/23661] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-31 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-31 23:34 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-01 12:10 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-31 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 23:11 -------
(I understood this between my mail to the list, and writing the previous
comment, in case you're wondering about the discrepancy :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-31 23:34 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-01 12:10 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-01 12:16 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-01 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 12:10 -------
Turns out FX approved the culprit patch :-) Anyway, I'm testing a fix.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |coudert at clipper dot ens
| |dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-01 12:10 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-01 12:16 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-01 14:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-01 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 12:16 -------
Oops. Would that be Paul T's patch to have "PRINT namelist" work?
Thanks Tobi for the fix!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-01 12:16 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-01 14:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-04 12:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-01 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 14:40 -------
For the record: I accidentallz attached an old version of the third testcase
which doesn't yet have the correct dg-annotations: the first dg-error should be
removed, the second turned into a dg-warning.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-01 14:41 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-04 12:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-04 12:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-04 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04 12:09 -------
Subject: Bug 23661
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: tobi@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-04 12:08:53
Modified files:
gcc/fortran : ChangeLog io.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: print_fmt_1.f90 print_fmt_2.f90
print_fmt_3.f
Log message:
fortran/
PR fortran/23661
* io.c (match_io): Correctly backup if PRINT followed by
symbol which is not a namelist. Force blank between PRINT
and namelist in free form.
testsuite/
PR fortran/23661
* gfortran.dg/print_fmt_1.f90, gfortran.dg/print_fmt_2.f90
gfortran.dg/print_fmt_3.f90: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.535&r2=1.536
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/io.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6002&r2=1.6003
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_fmt_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_fmt_2.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_fmt_3.f.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-04 12:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-04 12:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-04 12:29 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 14:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-04 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04 12:26 -------
Subject: Bug 23661
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: tobi@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-04 12:25:46
Modified files:
gcc/fortran : ChangeLog io.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: print_fmt_1.f90 print_fmt_2.f90
print_fmt_3.f
Log message:
fortran/
PR fortran/23661
* io.c (match_io): Correctly backup if PRINT followed by
symbol which is not a namelist. Force blank between PRINT
and namelist in free form.
testsuite/
PR fortran/23661
* gfortran.dg/print_fmt_1.f90, gfortran.dg/print_fmt_2.f90
gfortran.dg/print_fmt_3.f90: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.335.2.111&r2=1.335.2.112
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/io.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.19.10.9&r2=1.19.10.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5084.2.373&r2=1.5084.2.374
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_fmt_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_fmt_2.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/print_fmt_3.f.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-04 12:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-04 12:29 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-07 14:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-04 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04 12:29 -------
Fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran
2005-08-31 19:42 [Bug fortran/23661] New: 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-04 12:29 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-07 14:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-07 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread