public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050905180441.32158.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050319080319.20548.laurent@guerby.net>
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05 18:04 -------
> The c52103x is now failing again (after the big commit), and c52104x c52104y
> now fail in mostly the same way whereas the never failed before:
It's actually a progress, the compiler was silently generating wrong code for
c52104x on all platforms, but that was not visible on Linux for some reasons.
All these tests now require -fstack-check to pass.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-05 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x " laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 14:43 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 14:59 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 15:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 22:39 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-04-04 19:13 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-04-08 10:58 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-06-11 23:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-07-09 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-25 19:01 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-08-29 13:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-05 17:54 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y " laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-05 18:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-09-05 19:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-05 22:21 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-06 6:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050905180441.32158.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).