public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
@ 2005-03-19 8:03 laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 14:43 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-03-19 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
It works on x86, on x86_64 it started failing on mainline between
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 17 23:01:51 UTC 2005
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 18 18:13:38 UTC 2005
,.,. C52103X ACATS 2.5 05-03-18 21:10:49
---- C52103X CHECK THAT IN ARRAY ASSIGNMENTS AND IN SLICE ASSIGNMENTS,
THE LENGTHS MUST MATCH; ALSO CHECK WHETHER
CONSTRAINT_ERROR OR STORAGE_ERROR ARE RAISED FOR LARGE
ARRAYS.
- C52103X NO CONSTRAINT_ERROR FOR TYPE WITH 'LENGTH = INTEGER'LAST +
3.
- C52103X NO STORAGE_ERROR OR CONSTRAINT_ERROR RAISED WHEN ALLOCATING
TWO BIG BOOLEAN ARRAYS.
/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_all.sh: line 15:
9036 Segmentation fault $*
--
Summary: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-03-19 14:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 14:59 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-19 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-19 14:43 -------
The following patches might be the cause:
+2005-03-18 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
+
+ PR middle-end/20225
+ * cgraph.c (cgraph_mark_reachable_node): Assert that it is not called
+ too late.
+ * varasm.c (find_decl_and_mark_needed): Mark needed only when not
+ called too late.
+
+2005-03-18 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
+
+ * tree-into-ssa.c (find_idf): Use VEC_quick_push instead of
+ VEC_safe_push.
+
+2005-03-18 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
+
+ * combine.c (gen_binary): Remove.
+ (known_cond, simplify_shift_const, find_split_point,
+ combine_simplify_rtx, simplify_if_then_else, simplify_set,
+ simplify_logical, expand_field_assignment, extract_left_shift,
+ force_to_mode, if_then_else_cond, apply_distributive_law,
+ simplify_and_const_int, simplify_shift_const, gen_lowpart_for_combine,
+ simplify_comparison, reversed_comparison): Replace with
+ simplify_gen_binary, simplify_gen_relational or
+ distribute_and_simplify_rtx.
+ (distribute_and_simplify_rtx): New function.
+
+
+ * tree-cfg.c (fold_cond_expr_cond): Use boolean types for condition.
+
+ * cgraph.c (cgraph_remove_node): Avoid loop in code deciding whether
+ function body should be released; do not proactively release function
+ bodies in non-unit-at-a-time mode.
+
+2005-03-18 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
+
+ * builtins.c (fold_builtin_bitop): Take decomposed arguments
+ of CALL_EXPR.
+ (fold_builtin_1): Update a call to fold_builtin_bitop.
+
+ * builtins.c (fold_builtin_signbit): Take decomposed arguments
+ of CALL_EXPR.
+ (fold_builtin_1): Update a call to fold_builtin_signbit.
+
Do you know if this happens on the 4.0 branch also, if it does not it removes the patch for "PR middle-
end/20225", otherwise that is the patch which caused it as no other patch went in both branches?
I almost this is caused by a copy and pasto with the combine patch.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|ACATS c52103x segfault at |[4.1 Regression] ACATS
|runtime on x86_64 |c52103x segfault at runtime
| |on x86_64
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 14:43 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-19 14:59 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 15:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-03-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-03-19 14:59 -------
I haven't tested x86_64 on current 4.0, will try this weekend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 14:43 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 14:59 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-03-19 15:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 22:39 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-19 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-19 15:38 -------
Uncovered by a front-end change. Not sure it can work on 64-bit machines now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-19 15:38:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-19 15:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-03-19 22:39 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-04-04 19:13 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-03-19 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-03-19 22:38 -------
The bug is 4.1 only, it works on 4.0, consistent with front end problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-03-19 22:39 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-04-04 19:13 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-04-08 10:58 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-04-04 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-04-04 19:13 -------
Same failure on 4.1.0 20050404 (experimental) (hppa-unknown-linux-gnu)
seen by J. David Anglin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-04 19:13 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-04-08 10:58 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-06-11 23:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-04-08 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-04-08 10:58 -------
Same failure on 4.1.0 20050405 (experimental) powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-04/msg00414.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-04-08 10:58 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-06-11 23:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-07-09 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-06-11 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-11 23:10 -------
Still there on 4.1 20050611 x86_64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-11 23:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-07-09 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-25 19:01 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-09 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-09 23:31 -------
Fails on powerpc-darwin also on the mainline now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-07-09 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-25 19:01 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-08-29 13:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-08-25 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-25 18:09 -------
As of LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 25 10:17:37 UTC 2005
this test now pass on x86_64-linux.
Could people test on hppa and powerpc?
(I removed the target milestone since Ada is not release critical anyway)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-25 19:01 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-08-29 13:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-05 17:54 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y " laurent at guerby dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-29 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29 13:38 -------
This test will very likely be affected by a yet-to-be-merged front-end change.
Therefore back to normal state.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2005-03-19 15:38:24 |2005-08-29 13:38:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-29 13:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-05 17:54 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-05 18:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-09-05 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-05 17:54 -------
As of
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep 5 10:34:13 UTC 2005
The c52103x is now failing again (after the big commit), and c52104x c52104y now
fail in mostly the same way whereas the never failed before:
,.,. C52104X ACATS 2.5 05-09-05 14:26:05
---- C52104X CHECK THAT IN ARRAY ASSIGNMENTS AND IN SLICE ASSIGNMENTS,
THE LENGTHS MUST MATCH; ALSO CHECK WHETHER
CONSTRAINT_ERROR OR STORAGE_ERROR ARE RAISED FOR LARGE
ARRAYS.
- C52104X NO CONSTRAINT_ERROR FOR TYPE WITH 'LENGTH = INTEGER'LAST +
3.
/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_all.sh: line 15:
3394 Segmentation fault $*
,.,. C52104Y ACATS 2.5 05-09-05 14:26:05
---- C52104Y CHECK THAT IN ARRAY ASSIGNMENTS AND IN SLICE ASSIGNMENTS,
THE LENGTHS MUST MATCH.
- C52104Y NO CONSTRAINT_ERROR FOR NON-NULL ARRAY SUBTYPE WHEN ONE
DIMENSION HAS INTEGER'LAST + 3 COMPONENTS.
/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_all.sh: line 15:
3427 Segmentation fault $*
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1 Regression] ACATS |[4.1 Regression] ACATS
|c52103x segfault at runtime |c52103x c52104x c52104y
|on x86_64 |segfault at runtime on
| |x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-05 17:54 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y " laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-09-05 18:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-05 19:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-05 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05 18:04 -------
> The c52103x is now failing again (after the big commit), and c52104x c52104y
> now fail in mostly the same way whereas the never failed before:
It's actually a progress, the compiler was silently generating wrong code for
c52104x on all platforms, but that was not visible on Linux for some reasons.
All these tests now require -fstack-check to pass.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-05 18:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-05 19:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-05 22:21 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-06 6:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-09-05 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-05 19:09 -------
Ok testing:
Index: stack.lst
===================================================================
RCS file: stack.lst
diff -N stack.lst
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ stack.lst 5 Sep 2005 19:08:30 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+c52103x
+c52104x
+c52104y
Index: run_all.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/run_all.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 run_all.sh
--- run_all.sh 18 Apr 2005 17:32:56 -0000 1.19
+++ run_all.sh 5 Sep 2005 19:08:30 -0000
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@
counti=0
for i in `cat $dir/tests/$chapter/${chapter}.lst`; do
counti=`expr $counti + 1`
+
extraflags=""
grep $i $testdir/overflow.lst > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
@@ -215,6 +216,11 @@
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
extraflags="$extraflags -gnatE"
fi
+ grep $i $testdir/stack.lst > /dev/null 2>&1
+ if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
+ extraflags="$extraflags -fstack-check"
+ fi
+
test=$dir/tests/$chapter/$i
mkdir $test && cd $test >> $dir/acats.log 2>&1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-05 19:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-09-05 22:21 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-06 6:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-09-05 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-05 22:20 -------
-fstack-check doesn't seem to cure the problem, any idea?
Laurent
gnatmake --GCC="/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/" -gnatws -O2
-fstack-check
-I/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/support
c52103x.adb -largs
--GCC="/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/"
/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/xgcc -c
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/ -gnatws -O2
-fstack-check
-I/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/support
c52103x.adb
gnatbind -aO./
-I/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/support
-I- -x c52103x.ali
gnatlink c52103x.ali -fstack-check
--GCC=/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20050905T211402/gcc/
RUN c52103x
,.,. C52103X ACATS 2.5 05-09-05 22:56:29
---- C52103X CHECK THAT IN ARRAY ASSIGNMENTS AND IN SLICE ASSIGNMENTS,
THE LENGTHS MUST MATCH; ALSO CHECK WHETHER
CONSTRAINT_ERROR OR STORAGE_ERROR ARE RAISED FOR LARGE
ARRAYS.
- C52103X NO CONSTRAINT_ERROR FOR TYPE WITH 'LENGTH = INTEGER'LAST +
3.
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow detected
FAIL: c52103x
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-05 22:21 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-09-06 6:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-06 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-06 06:16 -------
> -fstack-check doesn't seem to cure the problem, any idea?
Does it not at least prevent the segmentation faults? Recovering from a
STORAGE_ERROR is another story and doesn't work very well with the FSF compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-14 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 07:49 -------
> Patch pending.
No, there is no possible patch. They *have* to be compiled with -fstack-check.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|dot nyu dot edu |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
@ 2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-11-14 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-14 07:47 -------
Patch pending.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra
|dot org |dot nyu dot edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: laurent at guerby dot net @ 2005-11-03 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-03 08:47 -------
Started passing on x86-linux but still failing on x86_64 as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Nov 2 22:35:36 UTC 2005 (revision 106403)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-22 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-22 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-14 7:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-19 8:03 [Bug ada/20548] New: ACATS c52103x segfault at runtime on x86_64 laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 14:43 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 14:59 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-03-19 15:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-19 22:39 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-04-04 19:13 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-04-08 10:58 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-06-11 23:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-07-09 23:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-25 19:01 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-08-29 13:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-05 17:54 ` [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y " laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-05 18:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-05 19:10 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-05 22:21 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-09-06 6:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-20548-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22 21:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 8:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:47 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2005-11-14 7:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).