From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23123 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2005 06:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23094 invoked by uid 48); 6 Sep 2005 06:16:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 06:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050906061611.23093.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050319080319.20548.laurent@guerby.net> References: <20050319080319.20548.laurent@guerby.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/20548] [4.1 Regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault at runtime on x86_64 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00629.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-06 06:16 ------- > -fstack-check doesn't seem to cure the problem, any idea? Does it not at least prevent the segmentation faults? Recovering from a STORAGE_ERROR is another story and doesn't work very well with the FSF compiler. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548