From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22001 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2005 01:26:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21968 invoked by uid 48); 7 Sep 2005 01:26:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050907012629.21967.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "amodra at bigpond dot net dot au" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050902224151.23704.rth@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050902224151.23704.rth@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/23704] gcc.dg/rs6000-fpint.c fails X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-09-07 01:26 ------- Indeed, that is what is happening. -m64 ought to normally imply -mpowerpc-gfxopt, because all powerpc64 capable chips also support the insns enabled by -mpowerpc-gfxopt as far as I know. However, I guess there's not much harm in preventing -m64 from overriding a prior -mno-powerpc-gfxopt. Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c,v retrieving revision 1.866 diff -u -p -r1.866 rs6000.c --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c 6 Sep 2005 02:04:59 -0000 1.866 +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c 7 Sep 2005 01:11:56 -0000 @@ -1620,9 +1620,9 @@ rs6000_handle_option (size_t code, const #else case OPT_m64: #endif - target_flags |= MASK_POWERPC64 | MASK_POWERPC | MASK_PPC_GFXOPT; - target_flags_explicit |= MASK_POWERPC64 | MASK_POWERPC - | MASK_PPC_GFXOPT; + target_flags |= MASK_POWERPC64 | MASK_POWERPC; + target_flags |= ~target_flags_explicit & MASK_PPC_GFXOPT; + target_flags_explicit |= MASK_POWERPC64 | MASK_POWERPC; break; #ifdef TARGET_USES_AIX64_OPT -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23704