From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22166 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2005 19:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22158 invoked by uid 48); 7 Sep 2005 19:37:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050907193749.22156.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050907170304.23767.afra@cs.stanford.edu> References: <20050907170304.23767.afra@cs.stanford.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/23767] std::vector iterator implementation wrong X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00857.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-07 19:37 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Unfortunatly I don't believe thats possible without passing extra > information by more template parameters, which would break binary compatability. In short, in my preliminary opinion, we can well envisage this assuming anything we do actually changes the signature of the constructor. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23767