public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/23240] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails
@ 2005-08-04 21:30 jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 21:56 ` [Bug target/23240] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-04 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution, -Os
(a new test) have appeared on mainline on 20050804 on ia64-hp-hpux11.23, both
-mlp64 and -milp32.
--
Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails
2005-08-04 21:30 [Bug tree-optimization/23240] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-04 21:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-05 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-04 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04 21:56 -------
This looks like a target issue.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|tree-optimization |target
GCC target triplet| |ia64-hp-hpux11.23
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails
2005-08-04 21:30 [Bug tree-optimization/23240] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 21:56 ` [Bug target/23240] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-05 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 12:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-08 16:34 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-05 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-05 16:51 -------
Hmm, does this work now after PR 23135 was fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails
2005-08-04 21:30 [Bug tree-optimization/23240] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 21:56 ` [Bug target/23240] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-05 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-10 12:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-08 16:34 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-10 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-10 12:12 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-10 12:12:05
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails
2005-08-04 21:30 [Bug tree-optimization/23240] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-10 12:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-08 16:34 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2005-09-08 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-09-08 16:34 -------
This test uses vectors. It looks like the vector code for IA64 was written and
tested on Linux (which is little-endian) and this test fails on HP-UX which is
big-endian. The program below prints '1500 1300' on Linux but prints '1300
1500' on HP-UX. I think endianness was not considered somewhere in the vector
code but I am not sure where.
typedef int __attribute__((vector_size (8))) vecint;
typedef int __attribute__((mode(SI))) siint;
vecint i = { 150, 100 };
vecint j = { 10, 13 };
vecint k;
union {
vecint v;
siint i[2];
} res;
int
main ()
{
vecint k0, k1, k2, k3, k4, k5, k6, k7;
k1 = i * j;
res.v = k1;
printf("%d %d\n", res.i[0], res.i[1]);
exit (0);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-23240-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-23 22:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-04 21:30 [Bug tree-optimization/23240] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-04 21:56 ` [Bug target/23240] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-05 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 12:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-08 16:34 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com
[not found] <bug-23240-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-12 23:49 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-23 22:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).