From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-157663-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13463 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2005 08:07:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13191 invoked by uid 48); 10 Sep 2005 08:07:48 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 08:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050910080748.13188.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "mike at codeweavers dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20050113200457.19430.terra@gnome.org>
References: <20050113200457.19430.terra@gnome.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/19430] Missing uninitialized warning
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg01257.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mike at codeweavers dot com  2005-09-10 08:07 -------

Simplifying things a bit:

void foo(int*);
void bar(void) { int x; if(x) foo(&x); }

gcc -c foo.c -Wall -O2 -Wuninitialized

(More stunning silence.)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430