From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32079 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2005 08:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31997 invoked by uid 48); 11 Sep 2005 08:04:57 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050911080457.31996.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "appfault at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030509203601.10719.sb@biallas.net> References: <20030509203601.10719.sb@biallas.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/10719] invalid code generated (x86, "int $5") with __builtin_va_arg(va, char); X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg01322.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From appfault at hotmail dot com 2005-09-11 08:04 ------- Invalid? So whenever behavior is undefined by the C standard, would it be ok to delete the user's harddrive as well? This is ridiculous - fix the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10719