public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86
@ 2005-07-30 23:13 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-07-31 0:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-07-30 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Compiling xterm-202 on i686-pc-linux-gnu shows that 4.1 generates bigger code
than 4.0.
This happens for all combinations of {-march=i386 and -march=i686} and
{-O2 and -Os}.
size -f 4.*/xterm
text data bss dec hex filename
175215 21724 6684 203623 31b67 4.0-O2-i386/xterm
181835 14052 6684 202571 3174b 4.1-O2-i386/xterm
189064 21728 6684 217476 35184 4.0-O2-i686/xterm
195680 14056 6684 216420 34d64 4.1-O2-i686/xterm
148727 21724 6684 177135 2b3ef 4.0-Os-i386/xterm
156443 14052 6684 177179 2b41b 4.1-Os-i386/xterm
149011 21724 6684 177419 2b50b 4.0-Os-i686/xterm
156779 14052 6684 177515 2b56b 4.1-Os-i686/xterm
The same is true for the individual object files, not only for the final binary.
The preprocessed sources can be obtained from PR22574
If someone wants to investigate the cause, maybe it would be a good idea to look
at one of the small files like xstrings.i (500 bytes text size).
--
Summary: code size regression from 4.0 on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-07-31 0:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-31 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 23:13 -------
This could be many things, first we don't care about code size for -O2.
Second this is most likely jump threading.
Can you add -ftree-dominator-opts and see what the code size problems are?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-07-31 0:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-01 14:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-01 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Summary|code size regression from |[4.1 Regression] code size
|4.0 on x86 |regression from 4.0 on x86
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-07-31 0:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-01 14:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 18:51 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-01 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|rtl-optimization |tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-01 18:51 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-01 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-08-01 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-01 18:51 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> This could be many things, first we don't care about code size for -O2.
>
> Second this is most likely jump threading.
>
> Can you add -ftree-dominator-opts and see what the code size problems are?
I am not sure what you are asking. Aren't tree-dominator-opts enabled by default
at -O2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-01 18:51 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-08-01 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 20:43 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-01 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01 18:57 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am not sure what you are asking. Aren't tree-dominator-opts enabled by default
> at -O2?
I had meant -fno-tree-dominator-opts.
See PR 21883 for an example where DOM causes a code size increase.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |21883
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-01 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-01 20:43 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-08 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-08-01 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-01 20:43 -------
-fno-tree-dominator-opts does not seem to have a great influence.
text data bss dec hex filename
181547 14052 6684 202283 3162b 4.1-nodopts-O2-i386/xterm
195088 14056 6684 215828 34b14 4.1-nodopts-O2-i686/xterm
156043 14052 6684 176779 2b28b 4.1-nodopts-Os-i386/xterm
156459 14052 6684 177195 2b42b 4.1-nodopts-Os-i686/xterm
175627 21724 6684 204035 31d03 4.0-nodopts-O2-i386/xterm
189704 21728 6684 218116 35404 4.0-nodopts-O2-i686/xterm
150191 21724 6684 178599 2b9a7 4.0-nodopts-Os-i386/xterm
150567 21724 6684 178975 2bb1f 4.0-nodopts-Os-i686/xterm
Looking over a few files it does not look like there's a big difference
between the tree dumps for 4.1 and 4.0 (the .vars dumps), so I would guess the
some change at the rtl level is responsible for the size increase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-01 20:43 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-08-08 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 0:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-08 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |23289
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-08 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-10 0:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-10 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |23302
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-10 0:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-10 0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-11 9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-10 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |23303
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-10 0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-11 9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-19 21:50 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-11 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 23153 depends on bug 23289, which changed state.
Bug 23289 Summary: [4.1 Regression] tail call optimization not performed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23289
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-11 9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-19 21:50 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-19 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-08-19 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-19 21:47 -------
Is there any reason that this PR is still in "UNCONFIRMED" state?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-19 21:50 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-08-19 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-19 22:06 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-19 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |23488
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-19 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-19 22:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-19 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-19 21:54 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is there any reason that this PR is still in "UNCONFIRMED" state?
Because this really a meta-bug now.
And it looks like all the remaining issues are caused by:
2005-07-30 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Do not load mem targets into register.
* i386.c (ix86_fixup_binary_operands): Likewise.
(ix86_expand_unary_operator): Likewise.
(ix86_expand_fp_absneg_operator): Likewise.
* optabs.c (expand_vec_cond_expr): Validate dest.
So this is target issue.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn|21883 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|tree-optimization |target
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-19 21:54:52
date| |
Summary|[4.1 Regression] code size |[4.1 Regression] [meta-bug]
|regression from 4.0 on x86 |code size regression from
| |4.0 on x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-19 22:06 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
13 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-09-13 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-09-13 23:09 -------
Additional data:
For the testcase in PR8361:
size -f generate-3.4*.o
text data bss dec hex filename
297025 4 181 297210 488fa generate-3.4-4.0.o
318366 8 181 318555 4dc5b generate-3.4-4.1.o
so about a 7% increase for 4.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-03 0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-11-03 0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
5 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-11-03 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-11-03 00:59 -------
A very useful tool for comparing function sizes in 2 binaries/object file is:
ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/bloat-o-meter
it displays the function names, the size, the size difference as absolute value
and percentage. It would even be nice to have something like this in
gcc/contrib.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-03 0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-03 0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
5 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-11-03 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-11-03 00:53 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> What are the flags for the sizes in comment #7 and comment #8?
-O2 -march=i686
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-31 4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
@ 2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-03 0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
5 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 22:55 -------
What are the flags for the sizes in comment #7 and comment #8?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 16:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu @ 2005-10-31 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-10-31 04:15 -------
More data, the Linux kernel compiled for i686:
size -f *
text data bss dec hex filename
2625471 534012 611768 3771251 398b73 vmlinux.4.0
3023306 429364 347384 3800054 39fbf6 vmlinux.4.1
It would be good if someone else can try to reproduce this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 16:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] code size regression from 4.0 on x86
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-13 16:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-13 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-03 0:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-30 23:13 [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] New: code size regression from 4.0 on x86 dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-07-31 0:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 14:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/23153] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 18:51 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-01 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-01 20:43 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-08 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 0:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-10 0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-11 9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-19 21:50 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-08-19 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-19 22:06 ` [Bug target/23153] [4.1 Regression] [meta-bug] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-13 23:09 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
[not found] <bug-23153-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-13 16:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:15 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-02 22:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 0:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2005-11-03 0:59 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).