From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9342 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2005 16:23:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9269 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2005 16:23:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050914162311.9266.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030509203601.10719.sb@biallas.net> References: <20030509203601.10719.sb@biallas.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/10719] invalid code generated (x86, "int $5") with __builtin_va_arg(va, char); X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg01739.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 16:23 ------- > Ok, so that's the best code it can generate, fine. So if instant segfault is > the best possible generated code, I think NOT generating any code is far more > helpful to the user. If not generating any code doesn't conform to the > standard, then it seems like it should be at least optional. -Werror precisely exists for that purpose. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10719