From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12825 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2005 22:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12650 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2005 22:57:55 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050914225755.12649.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040727131653.16782.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20040727131653.16782.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/16782] Accepts qualified member function declaration in class X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg01783.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-09-14 22:57 ------- Well, we've been tightening the compiler in many places. I consider this a particularly useless extension -- it's true that it doesn't hurt anyone, but it adds nothing whatsoever of value to the language. I would be very much surprised if more than a handful of people have ever used it, and I can't think of a reason why it would be undue to ask them to fix their codes. In the interest of sticking with the language standards and to simplify the compiler, I vote for removing the extension. Even documenting it seems a waste of time to me. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782