From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20287 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2005 14:24:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19086 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2005 14:23:58 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050915142358.19085.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040727131653.16782.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20040727131653.16782.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/16782] Accepts qualified member function declaration in class X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg01827.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 14:23 ------- Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration in class I wouldn't mind turning this diagnostic on by default as a pedwarn. As usual, people who want their code to build anyway can use -fpermissive. I'm strongly opposed to adding a flag for this diagnostic; I don't want to use warning flags for things that make the code technically ill-formed. I'm not particularly sympathetic to Dan's desire to be able to make GCC exactly as pedantic as EDG. If you don't want to deal with all the warnings from -pedantic, you can also filter them out with grep. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782