public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/23907] New: missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in gcc/fortran/simplify.c?
@ 2005-09-16 0:16 skyhover at hotmail dot com
2005-09-16 2:02 ` [Bug fortran/23907] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 5:46 ` skyhover at hotmail dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: skyhover at hotmail dot com @ 2005-09-16 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
We noticed the function has no switch case for "BT_COMPLEX" by similarity check
against other functions such as "gfc_simplify_range" in the same file. I think
it's reasonable for a complex to have a radix. So one "case BT_COMPLEX:" may be
needed just after "case BT_REAL:" at line 2513. Could you please inspect my
observations?
I also have similar doubts on functions "gfc_simplify_dim",
"gfc_simplify_huge", "gfc_simplify_sign", and etc.
Thanks a lot.
--
Summary: missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in
gcc/fortran/simplify.c?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: skyhover at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23907
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23907] missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in gcc/fortran/simplify.c?
2005-09-16 0:16 [Bug fortran/23907] New: missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in gcc/fortran/simplify.c? skyhover at hotmail dot com
@ 2005-09-16 2:02 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 5:46 ` skyhover at hotmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-16 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 02:01 -------
gfc_simplify_radix is used in intrinsic.c for simplification of the
RADIX intrinsic function. The standard defines RADIX for REAL and
INTEGER. See 13.14.84.
program mn
complex z
print*, radix(z)
end program mn
kargl[207] gfc41 -static -o z mn.f90
In file mn.f90:3
print*, radix(z)
1
Error: 'x' argument of 'radix' intrinsic at (1) must be INTEGER or REAL
The same holds for gfc_simplify_huge, gfc_simplify_dim, and gfc_simplify_sign.
Please read Chapter 13 of the standard and intrinsic.c
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23907
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/23907] missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in gcc/fortran/simplify.c?
2005-09-16 0:16 [Bug fortran/23907] New: missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in gcc/fortran/simplify.c? skyhover at hotmail dot com
2005-09-16 2:02 ` [Bug fortran/23907] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-16 5:46 ` skyhover at hotmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: skyhover at hotmail dot com @ 2005-09-16 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From skyhover at hotmail dot com 2005-09-16 05:45 -------
Thanks for your information and clarification. I agree now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23907
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-16 5:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-16 0:16 [Bug fortran/23907] New: missing switch-case in function "gfc_simplify_radix" in gcc/fortran/simplify.c? skyhover at hotmail dot com
2005-09-16 2:02 ` [Bug fortran/23907] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 5:46 ` skyhover at hotmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).