From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14182 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2005 20:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14139 invoked by uid 48); 16 Sep 2005 20:34:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050916203439.14137.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041202234223.18803.bangerth@dealii.org> References: <20041202234223.18803.bangerth@dealii.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02057.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 20:34 ------- The backport of the fix for PR 18445 caused this. I'll try to backport the fix for PR18803, too. If that fails, reverting the patch for PR 18445 seems like the right thing to me, because this was only an ice-on-invalid-code. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18803