From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-158464-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26123 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2005 20:57:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26066 invoked by uid 48); 16 Sep 2005 20:57:28 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20050916205728.26065.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041202234223.18803.bangerth@dealii.org>
References: <20041202234223.18803.bangerth@dealii.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02058.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-16 20:57 -------
IMHO reverting 18445 would be the most prudent thing to do.  The combination of
18845+18803 are touching too many things for my liking.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18803