public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050916210428.30062.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041202234223.18803.bangerth@dealii.org>


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-16 21:04 -------
On 16 Sep, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> IMHO reverting 18445 would be the most prudent thing to do.  The combination
> of 18845+18803 are touching too many things for my liking.

Gaby, would that be OK with you?

I'd revert the patch for PR 18445 on the 3.4 branch, add the testcase
for PR18803 to the 3.4 branch (bootstrapped and regtested, of course),
and close PR 18445 as fixed in 4.0.0 and WONTFIX in 3.4.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18803


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-16 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-02 23:42 [Bug c++/18803] New: [4.0 " bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-02 23:42 ` [Bug c++/18803] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-02 23:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-02 23:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-03 10:47 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-08  8:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-08  8:41 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-12  1:19 ` [Bug c++/18803] [3.4.5 " bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-09-12  1:22 ` [Bug c++/18803] [3.4 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-15 11:37 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 20:34 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 20:57 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-16 21:04 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2005-09-16 22:41 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-09-17 20:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-17 20:53 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-18803-102@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-04-16  3:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-23  5:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050916210428.30062.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).