From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18760 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 00:36:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18750 invoked by uid 48); 19 Sep 2005 00:36:19 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050919003619.18749.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050918174933.23955.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20050918174933.23955.rguenth@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/23955] Compile time regressions with tramp3d X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02374.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-19 00:36 ------- Hmm: tree operand scan : 9.20 ( 5%) usr 2.05 (28%) sys 11.56 ( 6%) wall tree operand scan : 3.15 ( 2%) usr 0.93 (19%) sys 4.87 ( 3%) wall That might mean this is about the same issue as PR 23490. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23955