From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15669 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 12:26:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by uid 48); 19 Sep 2005 12:25:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050919122526.15014.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "Erwin dot Unruh at fujitsu-siemens dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050831093304.23650.Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com> References: <20050831093304.23650.Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/23650] Scheduler does not handle zero_extract correctly X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02401.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From Erwin dot Unruh at fujitsu-siemens dot com 2005-09-19 12:25 ------- Created an attachment (id=9773) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9773&action=view) testcase supplement Here is some additional coding, which calls the function given in the bug report. The exit code is 1 in case of error, zero otherwise. I was able to verify my original analysis with this test. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23650