From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 759 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 17:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 521 invoked by uid 48); 19 Sep 2005 17:57:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050919175715.520.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050831093304.23650.Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com> References: <20050831093304.23650.Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/23650] Scheduler does not handle zero_extract correctly X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg02440.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-19 17:57 ------- Created an attachment (id=9774) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9774&action=view) complete testcase Combining comment #1 and the testcase, declaring some functions and exchaning printf for abort() I cannot reproduce the bug as the testcase aborts with every optimization level, even -O0 -fno-strict-aliasing and shows this same behavior even with the intel compiler. Can you re-check, if the testcase is really working in some case? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23650